Refutation Essay

Essay #3: Refutation Essay

Peer Review Draft Due: 10/25    (in-class peer reviews 10/27)

Final and Initial Drafts Due: 11/3

Write a 5-6 page (1200-1500 words) essay in which you refute the opposing side to an issue that you feel strongly about. Specifically, you will use one of the four article handouts that I give you to help you develop a position and refute the opposing argument. Before you begin, you should already have a clear position of your own about the topic/issue. This position informs or shapes your refutation of the opposition. Then identify your opponent and analyze his/her argument, using the rhetorical strategies we have learned in our previous essays of analysis and evaluation. Finally, demonstrate how the opposing argument is:

·         Somewhat invalid/missing points. To a degree they are right, but some things are amiss.

·         Completely invalid. After reviewing this evidence, there is no way that they can be right.

·         Irrelevant. The point is off topic and has no relevance to our discussion.

*Keep in mind that refutations must be specified, researched and completely understood before stating that they are wrong. This will ensure that you are well prepared to answer any counter arguments.

 Your essay should develop several points in the following general pattern:

• Clearly define the topic you're addressing. Then state your position and your reasoning briefly.
• Reasonably and fairly summarize the counter-argument you are going to refute.
• Weigh the argument against the facts. Does it misuse the facts? Does it leave some facts out? Does it emphasize the wrong ones? Does it account for exceptions?
• Show the weaknesses in the argument's logic. Is the value or meaning it attributes to the facts debatable? Is it based on questionable assumptions? Does it make unwarranted inferences? Does it draw irrelevant or unconnected implications? Does it include any logical fallacies?  

Your paper should:

1. Fairly present the issue and the counter argument.
2. Consistently maintain a reasonable tone in refuting the argument.
3. Carefully construct the whole refutation so that it actually enhances your argument for your position.